Proxy voting, engagement and escalation.
Shareholder resolutions are the primary mechanism through which long-term institutional investors exercise stewardship. We explain mechanics, voting thresholds, and real-world outcomes affecting capital allocation.
Institutional investors face a strategic choice: engage with portfolio companies to drive change, or divest and reallocate capital. The evidence suggests most asset owners pursue engagement as the primary lever, with divestment as a secondary tool.
Proxy voting enables institutional investors to exercise shareholder rights remotely. Understanding voting mechanisms, advisor recommendations, and stewardship obligations is critical for CIOs managing fiduciary governance.
ISS and Glass Lewis dominate proxy advisory services for institutional investors. This analysis compares their market position, governance frameworks, and material influence on shareholder voting outcomes.
Engagement only changes behaviour when there is a credible next step behind it. Here is the ladder.
Selling feels decisive. For an owner that holds the whole market, it is often the least powerful thing it can do.
The proxy advisors are stepping back from one-size-fits-all guidance. The vote, and the responsibility, return to the owner.
Research, charts, video and podcast analysis for the institutions investing at the scale of the world.
Five minutes, five days a week. Complimentary — subscriptions are reviewed by our editorial desk, and you'll receive a notice once approved.
You’re on the list. Tomorrow’s brief will arrive in your inbox.
Please enter a valid email.