Two competing fiduciary-process models are hardening on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Two competing fiduciary-process models are hardening on opposite sides of the Atlantic
The evolving legal and ethical definition of an asset owner's duty.
Two competing fiduciary-process models are hardening on opposite sides of the Atlantic
The weekly briefing on fiduciary duty for the world's largest owners.
Family office fiduciary duties mirror pension fund obligations but operate in a more concentrated ownership structure. Understanding these duties—and their limits—is essential for protecting family capital across generations.
Endowment fiduciary duty imposes strict legal obligations on trustees and investment committees to maximize long-term returns, act without conflicts, and preserve capital for future generations. Standards vary by state law and charter.
Long-term asset owners now interpret fiduciary duty as extending to future beneficiaries, not just current members. This shift reshapes how the world's largest pension funds approach climate risk, systemic sustainability, and decades-long capital allocation.
Fiduciary duty forms the legal and ethical foundation of pension fund management. We examine statutory obligations, trustee responsibilities, and governance implications for long-term allocators.
Duty of care requires institutional investors to act with competence and diligence when managing capital. We examine the legal framework, practical implementation, and how major asset owners structure governance to meet this obligation.
Pecuniary factors—monetary elements that influence investment decisions and fiduciary obligations—are central to institutional governance. Understanding their scope determines compliance with duty-of-care standards and allocation transparency.
A fiduciary standard legally binds advisers to prioritize client interests above profit. Understanding its scope and enforcement is critical for institutional investors evaluating adviser relationships and governance frameworks.
The sole interest rule is the legal cornerstone of pension fund fiduciary duty. We examine its application across institutional asset owners and the governance tensions it creates in an era of sustainable investing.
The prudent person rule governs how institutional investors must manage beneficiary assets. We explain its legal origins, application to asset allocation, and implications for long-term capital deployment.
The prudent investor rule sets the legal floor for fiduciary conduct in institutional investing. Understanding its application—and its limits—shapes governance and liability exposure for CIOs and investment committees.
Research, charts, video and podcast analysis for the institutions investing at the scale of the world.
Five minutes, five days a week. Free. Built for institutional capital.
You’re on the list. Tomorrow’s brief will arrive in your inbox.
Please enter a valid email.